Be What God Made You essays

Be What God Made You essays Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except all those others that have been tried time to time. Winston Churchill, after being witness to several forms of government, agreed with most free peoples that democracy is the best choice of government. Democratic governments offer its citizens the freedom to conduct their own affairs as they see fit, provided it is within the bounds of the law. Most people see democracys greatest attributes as the philosophy of one ballot, one vote, freedom of speech, and freedom of religion. Admittedly, a democratic government is not perfect, but it is still better than most other forms of government. Democracies embrace British philosopher, John Lokes idea that the leader is allowed to rule by consent of the people. The people are allowed to show their consent by casting ballots. Despite the fiasco behind Election 2000, this system of choosing leaders has proved to be a good one. Part of the appeal of the democratic voting practice is the philosophy of one ballot, one vote and the fact that once the election is over and the votes are counted, the victor is declared without question. People are not allowed to vote more that once per election and elections are not held repeatedly until the results are to the liking of one of the candidates. This was not the case in Germany when Adolf Hitler was vying for power. Hitler forced several elections to be held until the results were in favor of his political party. To help ensure favorable results, people were taken to polling places so they could vote several times for the Nazis. One of the most basic freedoms granted to citizens in a democratic society is the freedom of speech. Not having to fear retribution ...

The Nature of Love According to A Midsummer Nights Dream essays

The Nature of Love According to A Midsummer Nights Dream essays According to a Midsummer Nights Dream, love is something that can transform. It is not visible, and it is hidden. True love becomes questioned after you read this play: What does true love really mean? Is there more than one person that is your true love? If not or even if there is, what is the relationship? This play encourages people to believe that love is changeable and that you are not made to fall in love with just one person. The way the pairs of lovers all interacted together proves that love really is blind. A Midsummer Nights Dream suggests that love is not constant and is changeable. An example that is used to demonstrate this is when Demetrius and Lysander are in love with both Hermia and Helena at different times. At first, Demetrius and Lysander are in love with Hermia, and Helena is in love with Demetrius. A spell is put on them both to fall in love with Helena. At the end of the play, Lysander stays with Hermia and Demetrius is with Helena. Even though a spell was put on them, this is the proof that love may change and not stay constant. Love is small and undistinguishable, like far-off mountains turned into clouds; it can constantly move and change and often hard to notice, which leads to the second concept that is introduced in this play. A Midsummer Nights Dream also proposes that we are not made to fall in love with one person. It provides the people who are reading or listening to the play to believe that there is always a possibility to have another relationship where love is involved. An example of this is the two pairs of court lovers. Demetrius and Lysander seem to be in love with Hermia. However, at a different period of time they fall in love with Helena. But at the end, Demetrius says To her, my lord, was I berothed ere I saw Hermia. But like a sickness, did I loathe this food; But, as in health, come to my natural taste, now I do w...

Russian Politics - Instructions attached Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Russian Politics - Instructions attached - Essay Example The Russian Federation despite formally gaining its independence from the Soviet Union in December 1991 stuttered through to the end of the decade despite grave economic, political, and social problems, which President Yeltsin seemed incapable of dealing with. The Soviet Union had an economic system that proved to be highly ineffective, with the black market frequently providing essentials as well as luxury items. Hand in hand with the black markets went corruption and bribery. Black marketers frequently resorted to bribing communist party officials, the police and the KGB or they in turn extorted money off the black marketers. The Soviet leadership started to have concerns about economic stagnation, organised crime and to a lesser extent corruption in the early 1980s without understanding the extent of the economic malaise. Brezhnev had done nothing to halt economic decline and in fact worsened it by accelerating the arms race with the United States. It has been estimated that as much as 50% of the Soviet Union’s annual budgets was spent on weapons. By the 1980s the idea of abandoning the communist command economy in favour of capitalism and liberal democracy gained support in the USSR. For the reformers could look at the neo-liberal experience of the Thatcher and Reagan governments, the devastating economic effects in Argentina and Chile would have been more relevant. There was one group of pro-capitalist economists that hoped to bring in a market system to Russia, the ‘young reformers’.